This is the Newsletter of the USBIG Network (http://www.usbig.net), which promotes the discussion of the basic income guarantee (BIG) in the United States--a policy that would unconditionally guarantee a subsistence-level income for everyone. If you would like to be added to or removed from this list please email: Karl@Widerquist.com.
The Fifth Congress of the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network will be
conjunction with the Eastern Economic Association (EEA) Annual
Philadelphia at the Loews Hotel 1200 Market Street Philadelphia, Friday
February 24 to Sunday February 26, 2006. Featured speakers confirmed so
include Nicolaus Tideman, of
Virginia Polytechnic Institute University, and Heather
Boushey, of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
Proposals for presentations should include the following information:
2. Affiliation (if applicable), including job title and employer
3. Address including City, State, Zip Code (Postal Code), and Country
4. Telephone number
5. Email Address
6. Title of the presentation
7. Abstract (summary of 50 to 150 words)
Proposals for panel discussions should include a title, topic, and description of the panel and the information above for each participant. If the participants are not presenting formal papers, the title of the paper and abstract may be omitted. Panels with formal paper presentations should be limited to four presentations, although discussions without formal papers can include more.
Presentations at this year’s conference will be organized into two groups: Academic panels (including researchers in all disciplines) will be organized by Michael Anthony Lewis and Eri Noguchi. Nonacademic panels (including activists, practitioners, and laypersons) will be organized by Al Sheahen.
Academic proposals should be directed to Eri Noguchi at email@example.com.
Nonacademic proposals should be directed to Al Sheahen at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Everyone who attends must register with the EEA. Indicate on your registration form that you will be attending the USBIG conference and you can register at the members’ price ($45 in advance and $60 on site) without paying the EEA membership fee (saving more than half of the total cost). Information about registration will be on the USBIG website soon. For more information see the USBIG website (http://www.usbig.net) or contact the conference organizers (Michael Anthony Lewis and Eri Noguchi at email@example.com, and Al Sheahen at firstname.lastname@example.org).
Basic Income Studies: An International
Journal of Basic Income Research (BIS) is a new international
devoted to the critical discussion of and research into universal basic
and related policy proposals. BIS is published twice a year by an
team of scholars, with support from Red Renta Basica, the Basic Income
Network and the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network.
The inaugural issue of BIS will appear in 2006 with articles by Joel Handler, Stuart White and Yannick Vanderborght and a retrospective on Robert van der Veen and Philippe Van Parijs’s seminal article on “A Capitalist Road to Communism”. The retrospective includes a reprint of the original article and a set of specially written comments by Gerald Cohen, Erik Olin Wright, Doris Schroeder, Catriona McKinnon, Harry Dahms, Gijs van Donselaar and Andrew Williams.
BIS is currently inviting contributions from academic scholars, researchers, policy-makers and welfare advocates on a wide variety of topics pertaining to the universal welfare debate. The editors are interested in publishing research articles, book reviews, and short, accessible commentaries discussing aspects of basic income or a closely related topic. BIS accepts research from all main academic disciplines, and welcomes research that pushes the debate into previously uncharted areas. BIS aims to promote the research of young scholars as well as seasoned researchers, and the editors particularly welcome contributions from non-Western countries.
For more information, please visit our website at www.basicincomestudies.org or contact the editors, Jurgen De Wispelaere and Karl Widerquist, at email@example.com. Scholars who want to have their books considered for review or who would like to review a book for BIS should contact Sandra Gonzales at firstname.lastname@example.org.
-From the editors of BIS
Dividend checks from the Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) go out this month
$845.76 (US), to every Alaska resident. (The APF is the only existing
Income in the world. It pays yearly dividends based on earnings from an
investment fund created out of the state’s oil tax revenues.) The
down slightly from last year. The reason for the decline is that each
returns are tied to stock market returns over the last five years, and
market returns have been much lower than returns in the late 1990s. The
increases in oil prices are increasing the total size of the fund, but
be years before their affects are felt in the yearly dividends.
The idea of the fund is gathering more and more attention around the world. The Alberta government is preparing to send checks of $400 (Canadian) to every resident of the province. The checks are a one-time response to the province’s large budget surplus, which has been caused largely by the recent increase in oil tax revenue. Although this is a one-time grant, the program’s architects credit the APF as inspiration. New Mexico, which also has a growing budget surplus thanks to the recent increase in oil prices, may be the soon follow suit. Governor Bill Richardson and prominent members of the state legislature have been discussing a one-time tax rebate in the neighborhood of $50 (US) per person.
The spread of the Permanent Fund idea does not stop with Alberta and New Mexico. Recent editorials have discussed the idea around the world. Kevin O'Flynn, writing for Newsweek International, mentioned the APF as one of the possible models for reform of Russia’s oil industry. Two recent editorials have argued for a permanent oil dividend in Iraq. Lenny Glynn, writing for The Weekly Standard, argues than enshrining an oil dividend into Iraq’s constitution would be a force for democracy, national unity, and economic development. It would almost certainly make the constitution more popular. Ronald Bailey, writing for Reason on line: Free Minds and Free Markets, includes the creation of an “Iraq Permanent Fund” in his list of things the Bush administration should have done for a successful post-war Iraq (http://www.reason.com/links/links081805.shtml).
Petroleum.com: Latin American Energy, Oil & Gas included a commentary by Michael Rowan, entitled “the Sinkhole,” praising Permanent Fund and comparing it to Venezuela’s nationalization of its oil industry. Governor Jay Hammond began setting up the permanent fund at about the same time that Carlos Andres Perez nationalized Venezuela’s oil industry in 1976. Rowan argues that nationalization of 100% of Venezuela’s oil revenues had no noticeable affect on poverty in Venezuela, but the Alaska fund, which distributes only a fraction of the taxes on Alaska oil revenues, has provided a real and verifiable benefit to low-income Alaskans—and has been especially important in reducing poverty among indigenous Alaskans. “If [Perez] had done what Hammond did in 1976, Venezuela's Permanent Fund would have about $120 billion this year, paying a dividend of $1,500 to each of 8 million Venezuelan families.” The editorial is hostile to activist government policies, but it is not hostile to policies that affectively help the poor. Rowan’s endorsement shows that the Permanent Fund idea is a good way to promote anti-poverty policies with the political right, but that’s not all there is to it. People who normally favor redistribution should not ignore Rowan’s argument that getting money into the hands of the poor can be more effective toward economic equality than putting government in direct control of resources. Rowan’s commentary is on line at: http://www.petroleumworld.com/Ed081105.htm.
BIEN reports: According to the newspaper "The Namibian" (Sept. 27,
2005), on Friday 23 September 2005 Reverend Phillip Strydom (the
Secretary of the Council of Churches in Namibia) had an important
the Speaker of Parliament, Theo-Ben Gurirab. Strydom was representing
Income Grant (BIG) Coalition, a group of organizations proposing the
introduction of an unconditional, N$100 monthly grant to every Namibian
eligible for a Government pension. The coalition presented the Speaker
resource book it has compiled, and which contains research results, as
a model of the proposal's social, developmental, and financial impact.
Speaker of Parliament Theo-Ben Gurirab, "The Namibian" reports, has
assured the BIG Coalition that he would hand over the document to the
body, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human Resources and
Development, led by Swapo Chief Whip Ben Amathila.
The article from "The Namibian" can be found at http://allafrica.com/stories/200509270031.html
BIEN reports, basic income has gained new momentum and publicity over
year in Germany. In several recent articles and interviews, Götz Werner
owner and CEO of a German drugstore chain and professor at Universität
Karlsruhe, and Benediktus Hardorp (http://www.iep.uni-karlsruhe.de/download/a_tempo_Portraet_Hardorp.pdf),
expert on tax issues, have been proposing a shift from taxing income to
consumption and using it to support basic income. Werner and Hardorp
strong proponents of BI. They consider a BI and such a new tax system
to be one
and the same idea.
The German magazine Brand Eins (www.brandeins.de), known for its progressive take on economic developments, dedicated its July-August edition to the issue of work. In his opening essay, Wolf Lotter criticizes welfare-to-work programs by describing how unemployed are “trained” for new jobs which never materialize, acting as if they were performing meaningful labor. Lotter refers to numerous German initiatives and, following Götz Werner, suggests that a promising strategy for financing any basic income would be an increase in sales tax, hence taxing consumption, not income. The latter idea has been gaining ground within the German basic income discussion.
Publication of this special issue has prompted less progressive journals to turn their attention to a basic income, such as the influential weekly "Die Zeit" (www.zeit.de), which published an informed article in which its author, Kolja Rudzio, restates some standard criticisms ("Who would still want to pursue paid work? And would this not erode the very income needed for a UBI?" - see "Sozialhilfe für alle" [social assistance for all] by Kolja Rudzio (www.zeit.de/2005/38/Kasten_Arbeitslos)).
Moreover, in an interview given together with the Munich mayor Christian Ude in the newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung (Sept. 10, 2005), the renowned German sociologist Ulrich Beck has argued not only for a basic income combined with volunteering, as he has for years, but for the first time in favor of an unconditional basic income: “The utopia of the work society consisted once in freeing ourselves form the dominance of work. We have to expand what we already have: income security independent from labor and volunteering.”
Finally, two new books on basic income have just been published. Attac-Germany has edited a volume on the topic ("Grundeinkommen: bedingungslos"), and Vanderborght & Van Parijs' introductory book has just been translated from French ("Ein Grundeinkommen für alle?").
LIFE reports that TD Canada Trust, one of the largest Canadian banks,
released a report slamming the Canadian welfare system and recommending
of guaranteed income, "Providing a new credit at the federal level
open up an opportunity to collapse existing federal and provincial
credits in to a single program in a way that better serves the needs of
low-income Canadians." TD Economists Don Drummond and Gillian Manning
argue that Canada needs to "address cases of labour market failure,
wages are too low or hours of work insufficient to generate an adequate
income" because "being employed is not a guarantee that people will
not fall into low income... in 2001, 653,000 Canadians were in low
despite having a high work effort throughout the year." The authors
recommend combining federal and provincial tax credits in a single
falls short of a livable BIG, but according to Larochelle and
LIFE, it is a step in that direction and a big change from the usual
solution of slashing welfare and from arguments that a job is the best
For the full LIFE article go to: http://www.livableincome.org/atdreportanalysis.htm.
For an article in the Toronto Star on the TD report, go to: http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/200509090708448/print
For the full TD bank report: http://www.td.com/economics/special/welfare05.jsp
Several different individuals and groups have endorsed basic income in
Zealand. Lowell Manning in an editorial “A Better Way” for Scoop,
Independent News (September 12), criticizes the tax reform
policies of all the major New Zealand parties, proposing a transaction
a basic income. Democrats for Social Credit, a small party primarily
with monetary reform, include introduction of basic income on a short
what they would do in power. BIEN reports that “Parents Centre” chief
Viv Gurrey, “would like to see something like the Green's proposed
basic income to recognize the value of caring for children". According
Gurrey, such a basic income would "validate our role as parents and pay
to stay home and look after our kids".
Democrats for Social credit website is: http://www.democrats.org.nz/.
For Lowell Manning articles on BIG go to: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0509/S00118.htm, http://www.geocities.com/ubinz/LowellManning.html
Parents Centre's website: http://www.parentscentre.org.nz
New Zealand Herald's story on Viv Gurreny’s: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10343624
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina 25 April 2005: Public Presentation of the
Network of Basic Income.
The Argentinean Basic Income Network (REDAIC) held a public presentation at the Cultural Institute of Cooperation Floreal Gorini on April 25, 2005. Speakers included Rubén Lo Vuolo and Elsa Gil, of REDAIC, Patricia Aguirre of the National Ministry of Health Antoni Doménech of the Spanish BIG network (Red Renta Basica). More information is available on the REDAIC website: www.ingresociudadano.org
VIENNA (AT), 7-9 October 2005: Basic Income Congress.
BIEN reports, the German Basic Income Network together with the Austrian Network for Basic Income and Social Cohesion, ATTAC Germany, and ATTAC Austria hosted a three-day conference in Vienna. The program included several plenary sessions and 18 workshops covering themes from "basic income and global justice", "BI and labor market policy", "BI and democracy", "BI and gender relations" to "BI and alternative economies." Speakers included Philippe Van Parijs, Luise Gubitzer and Eduardo Suplicy. More information is on the web at: www.grundeinkommen2005.org.
BARCELONA (ES), 2-17 November 2005: Seminar "Charter of Emerging Human Rights".
BIEN reports, the Human Rights Institute of Catalonia and the Spanish Basic Income Network "Red Renta Basica" organize the seminar: "Charter of Emerging Human Rights: Towards a Basic Income of Citizenship". It will take place in Barcelona from the 2nd to 17th of November, and it is aimed to students, members of associations, social workers, politicians, academics and civil employees of local and regional administrations, among other collectivities. Its objective is the formation about the tool of the Basic Income, an innovating and stimulating answer to the current economical and social inequalities. The course is divided in theoretical and practical modules. It will also be a discussion meeting about the Charter of Emerging Human Rights, adopted in September 2004 in the framework of the Universal Forum of the Cultures-Barcelona 2004. Main working languages: Catalan and Spanish.
For further information: www.redrentabasica.org
BUENOS AIRES (AG), 5 November 2005: Meeting of the Argentinean Basic Income Network
BIEN reports, the next meeting of the Argentinean Basic Income Network (REDAIC) will take place on November 5th, from 9am to 1pm, at the Faculty of Economics, University of Buenos Aires. The topic of the workshop will be "Basic Income, work and ethics".
For further information: email@example.com
BERLIN (DE), 26-27 November 2005: Annual Meeting of the German Basic Income Network.
BIEN reports, on November 26-27, the German Basic Income Network will host its annual Meeting in Berlin. The thematic focus of this year's meeting will be the crisis of full employment and new vistas beyond full employment a basic income opens up. A call for papers has been issued and contributions dealing with the questions set out are cordially welcomed. See www.grundeinkommen.de for the call for papers as well as for updates on the program.
THE INTERNET: GLOBAL INCOME FOUNDATION DISCUSSION FORUM
According to BIEN, a new discussion has been started on the Discussion Forum of the Global Income Foundation by a contribution of Robert F. Clark, author of several books on global poverty. Topic: the financial and political feasibility of global guaranteed income proposals. Robert Clark proposes a global reimbursable tax credit of $365 a year as a more feasible proposition than other proposals.
The USBIG Discussion Paper Series is an online series of unpublished academic papers on the basic income guarantee or the state of poverty and inequality for the purpose generating discussion of the papers in advance of publication. New papers are listed in the USBIG Newsletter. Links to all papers in the series and the instructions for authors are online at http://www.usbig.net. New papers this month are:
Maria Ozanira da Silva e Silva
Joel F. Handler
Sean Healy and Brigid Reynolds
Eduardo Matarazzo Suplicy
Jose Antonio Noguera
Ayse Bugra and Caglar Keyder
Julieta Magdalena Elgarte
Robert F. Clark
ABSTRACT: Over the past half-century or so, the international community’s strategies for coping with global poverty have evolved through several stages. Each retains its partisans. Each in its own way has advanced the agenda of promoting economic growth and reducing extreme global poverty. But insufficiently. In stylized fashion, we can for convenience review these strategies under the following headings: (1) Growth Alone, (2) Growth and Infrastructure, (3) Growth, Infrastructure, and Jobs, (4) Growth, Infrastructure, Jobs, and Services, (5) Growth, Infrastructure, Jobs, Services, and Transfers. Despite global economic progress, the extent and severity of human poverty remains an affront to the world’s conscience. This is not likely to change in the coming decades unless antipoverty strategies evolve further. A straightforward but comprehensive remedy for extreme global poverty is a guaranteed minimum income. This paper concludes with a proposal for implementing that remedy internationally.
The Los Angeles Daily News, Tuesday, September 6, 2005
Al Sheahen, Guest Columnist
Writing a few days after Katrina struck New Orleans, Sheahen argues
poverty was one of the causes of death in the hurricane. “The rich and
families were able to escape Hurricane Katrina in planes and cars. But
poor and homeless families, with no cars and little money, were stuck.
they died.” He discusses recent increases in poverty and argues that
workers in the United States are no more than six months from
they lose their jobs in the increasingly contingent labor market. He
with a plea for a basic income guarantee, which, “would be like an
policy for everyone… [I]t could give each of us the assurance that, no
what happened, we and our families wouldn't starve.”
On-Line Opinion. Australian e-journal of social and political debate,
John Tomlinson, a senior lecturer in social policy at Queensland
Technology, argues that Australia should spend money for improving the
social security, and education of its poorest citizens rather than
resources on waging war in Iraq and Afghanistan. More generally, he
"there are alternatives to debilitating poverty in both the developed
developing world." One such alternative, Tomlinson writes, "is the
provision of a Basic Income". He refers to the Basic Income Guarantee
Australia, as well as to Brazilian and South African debates. Referring
Myron Frankman's proposals for a planet-wide citizen's income, he
"if such a basic income scheme were introduced then we could claim to
succeeded in making absolute poverty history".
Tomlinson's article can be found at http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3738
Membership in the USBIG Network is free and open to anyone who shares its goals. Six new members have joined USBIG in the last two months. To become a member of USBIG, go to http://www.usbig.net.
For links to dozens of BIG Websites around the world, go to http://www.usbig.net, and click on "links." These links are to any website with information about BIG, but USBIG does not necessarily endorse their content or their agendas.
Editor: Karl Widerquist
Research: Paul Nollen
Copyediting: Mike Murray and the USBIG Committee
Thanks for help with this issue to: Al Sheahen, Cindy L’Hirondelle, Yannick Vanderbroght, and Wallace Klink.
THE U.S. BASIC INCOME GUARANTEE (USBIG) NETWORK publishes this newsletter. The Network is dedicated to promoting the discussion of the basic income guarantee (BIG) in the United States. BIG is a generic name for any proposal to create a minimum income level, below which no citizen's income can fall. Information on BIG and USBIG can be found on the web at: http://www.usbig.net. If you know any BIG news; if you know anyone who would like to be added to this list; or if you would like to be removed from this list; please send me an email.
As always, your comments on this newsletter and the USBIG website are gladly welcomed.
-Karl Widerquist, Coordinator, USBIG. Karl@Widerquist.com