USBIG NEWSLETTER Vol. 11, No. 55 Winter 2010
This is the Newsletter of the USBIG Network (www.usbig.net),
which
promotes the discussion of the basic income guarantee (BIG) in the
United States. BIG is a policy that would unconditionally guarantee at
least a subsistence-level income for everyone. If you would like to be
added to or removed from this list please email: Karl@Widerquist.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. DEADLINE FOR
SUBMISSIONS APPROACHES FOR THE 13TH BIEN CONGRESS
2. JOINT USBIG/BIEN
CANADA CONFERENCE, Montreal April 15-16, 2010
3. EDITORIAL: Ten
years of the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network
4. COMPETING
PROPOSALS TO CHANGE THE RULES OF THE ALASKA PERMANENT FUND
DIVIDEND
5. U.S. FEDERAL AND
STATE LAWMAKERS CONSIDERING CAP-AND-DIVIDEND
6. IRAN MIGHT BE
MOVING TOWARD A BIG
7. THE CLOSE OF NAMIBIA
BIG PILOT PROJECT
8. KOREAN BASIC
INCOME NETWORK LAUNCHES WITH LARGE INAUGURAL CONFERENCE
9. OTHER BIG NEWS
FROM AROUND THE WORLD
10. BASIC INCOME
STUDIES HAS BOOKS IN NEED OF REVIEWERS
11. RECENT PUBLICATIONS
12. UPCOMING EVENTS
13. RECENT EVENTS
14. NEW DISCUSSION PAPERS
15. NEW LINKS
16. NEW MEMBERS
17. LINKS AND OTHER INFO
1.
DEADLINE FOR
SUBMISSIONS APPROACHES FOR THE 13TH BIEN CONGRESS
The Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN) will hold its thirteenth congress
on June 30, July 1st and 2nd, 2010, at the Faculty of Economics,
Administration and Accounting of the University of Sao Paulo. USBIG is
a national affiliate of BIEN.
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the President of Brazil has tentatively
agreed to open the Congress.
Presenters at the conference will discuss the prospects for basic
income after the global financial crisis, oil dividends as a source for
basic income funding, basic income in Latin America and the developing
world, workers movements and basic income, and many other topics.
The Congress will include presentations by Senator Eduardo Suplicy (of
the Brazilian Federal Senate); Philippe Van Parijs (of Université
Catholique de Louvain); Guy Standing (of University of Bath and Monash
University); Scott Goldsmith (of Institute of Social and Economic
Research at the University of Alaska Anchorage); Karl Widerquist
(Georgetown University-Qatar); Ruben Lo Vuolo (of REDIAC, the Argentine
Citizens' Income Network); Robert van der Veen (of the University of
Amsterdam); Claus Offe (Hertie School of Governance, Berlin); Bishop
Kameeta (of the Lutheran Church of Namibia) and many others.
The deadline for submission of papers and panel proposals has been
extended to April 12th 2010. The full call for papers, details,
registration instructions, preliminary featured speakers, and
accommodation are available at the Congress website:
www.bien2010brasil.com.
Information is also available on the BIEN
website: www.basicincome.org.
Paper and panel proposals can be submitted on the conference website:
www.bien2010brasil.com.
Questions should be sent to: bien2010.organisation@gmail.com.
2.
JOINT USBIG/BIEN
CANADA CONFERENCE, Montreal April 15-16, 2010
“Basic Income at a Time of Economic Upheaval: A Path to Justice and
Stability?”
A Joint conference of the USBIG Network and BIEN Canada
Organized by CREUM. Held at McGill University:
Faculty Club, Ole’s, 3450 McTavish Street
Montreal, Quebec 15-16 April 2010
The Ninth Congress of the USBIG Network will be jointly with the newly
formed Canadian network, BIEN Canada. This two-day conference is the
first collaboration between the two North American affiliates of the
Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN). It will focus on the prospects and
challenges of a BIG policy at a time of economic upheaval.
The conference will take place on April 15-16, 2010 at Mcgill
University. The chief organizer of the conference is Jurgen De
Wispelaere, of the University of Montreal. Although the event is
cosponsored and organized by the Centre de Recherche en Ethique de
l’Universite de Montreal (CREUM), registration has been so strong that
the event has been moved to a larger venue at McGill University. Thanks
to the larger venue, there is still room to register.
The conference features speeches by Dr. Louise Haagh (University of
York), Prof. Guy Standing (University of Bath), and Senator Eduardo
Suplicy (Sao Paulo, Brazil), as well as a Political Forum on “The
Politics of the Basic Income Guarantee” featuring Senators Art Eggleton
and Hugh Segal, Tony Martin MP, Amélie Châteauneuf (spokesperson of
FCPASQ), Rob Rainer (Executive Director of Canada Without Poverty), Al
Sheahen (Executive Committee Member of USBIG), and Sheila Regehr
(Director of National Council of Welfare). In addition there will be 5
panels with more than a dozen papers from scholars and practitioners
discussing a variety of issues related to the prospects and challenges
of introducing a BIG in Canada or the US. Radio CREUM will be covering
the event and broadcast some of the talks as well as selective
interviews, which will also be available on the net as podcasts.
The full program is now available on the conference website at
http://bigmontreal.wordpress.com/.
Everyone is welcome to attend and participation is free. To register
for the conference please contact Jurgen De Wispelaere at
BIGMontreal2010@gmail.com.
3.
EDITORIAL: Ten
years of the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network
This issue, Volume 11, Number 55, marks the tenth anniversary of the
USBIG Newsletter. The USBIG Network began over breakfast at the Kiev
diner in New York City in December 1999. Five people attended the first
meeting: Fred Block (a sociologist at University of California-Davis),
Charles M.A. Clark (an economist at St. John’s University), Michael A.
Lewis (sociologist, then at State University of New York-Stony Brook,
now at Hunter College), Pam Donavan (sociologist then at City
University of New York-Graduate Center, now at Bloomsburg University)
and me, Karl Widerquist (then an economist at the Levy Institute of
Bard College, now a philosopher at Georgetown University-Qatar).
Pam Donovan, Michael A. Lewis, and I had been graduate students
together at the City University of New York. We used to meet weekly to
discuss our work. Usually we ended up arguing about politics. One day
we discovered that the one policy we could all agree on was the basic
income, and so Michael Lewis and I decided to write a paper about it.
We gradually got involved with the Basic Income European Network
(BIEN), which had been providing a forum for dialogue on basic income
in Europe. There were several natural networks in Europe at the time,
but there was no equivalent in the United States. Through BIEN we got
in touch with Fred Block and Charles M.A. Clark, who had both being
doing research on basic income in the United States.
When Fred Block was in town for a conference, we all decided to meet
for breakfast. There was no agenda or anything, but the next thing I
knew we had decided to create a network, and I had volunteered to write
its newsletter. Ten years later, I’m still writing that newsletter. It
began with a circulation of about 30 people, including the five of us
from the meeting. Since then it has grown to nearly a thousand people.
We called the new organization “the U.S. Basic Income Guarantee
Network,” (The USBIG Network or just USBIG for short). We chose that
name partly because “basic income guarantee” (BIG) as a generic term
that includes various specific versions, such as “basic income,”
“negative income tax,” and “guaranteed income.” Also, it makes a nice
acronym and the domain name www.usbig.net
was available. We took on
only one goal: to increase discussion of the basic income guarantee in
the United States.
We started the network with a small seminar series in New York City in
2000, and in 2002 we began holding yearly conferences. We are now
preparing for our ninth conference, which will be our first joint
conference with the new Canadian basic income network, known as BIEN
Canada.
Over the last ten years, interest in the basic income guarantee has
grown steadily around the world. The Basic Income European Network
expanded to become the Basic Income Earth Network, and USBIG became one
of its first non-European affiliates. More books and articles on BIG
are published each year. Basic Income Studies has become the first
academic journal focusing entirely on basic income. Palgrave-MacMillan
is now preparing an entire book series on BIG. The first books in the
series are expected to be released in 2011 or 2012.
The USBIG Network has chosen to remain a nonpartisan discussion group,
but there are political action groups in the United States that are
pushing for basic income as part of their agenda.
BIG occasionally springs up as a live political issue in surprising
places. The only existing BIG in the world, the Alaska Permanent Fund
Dividend, continues to be an enormously popular policy. Two members of
the U.S. House of representatives signed on to the idea in 2006;
several other members of Congress have endorsed it in roundabout
ways—by endorsing a cap-and-dividend or an oil dividend for Iraq. There
are senators pushing for it in Canada and Brazil. More than two-dozen
members of the German Bundestag are committed to the idea. A Namibian
organization has just completed a two-year pilot project on BIG. And so
on. And so on.
Writing the USBIG Newsletter has been an interesting experiment. At
first I didn’t think there could possibly be enough news about BIG to
report in regular issues, but instead I quickly became overwhelmed by
how much activity is going on in the world. Somehow, I’ve managed to
condense a significant portion of it into the Newsletter. Thanks to the
miracle of the internet I’ve been able to work on the USBIG newsletter
in New York; New Orleans; England; the far north of Sweden; Hong Kong;
Brazil; Qatar; and I can’t even remember where else.
On the whole I think I’ve kept my reporting accurate, but I can recall
a few embarrassing errors—such as the time I identified a British MP as
being from Australia. I’ve enjoyed reporting on the progress of BIG
movements around the world. I’ve enjoyed meeting all the interesting
who work on this issue. I’ve suffered through writing obituaries for
friends I’ve gotten to know in the movement.
I hope when I look back ten years from now, I’ll remember reporting on
the introduction of the world’s second basic income guarantee,
somewhere in the world.
-Karl Widerquist, in flight over the Atlantic, February 24, 2010
(revised, March 15, 2010, Doha, Qatar)
4.
COMPETING
PROPOSALS TO CHANGE THE RULES OF THE ALASKA PERMANENT FUND DIVIDEND
Several news organizations are reporting that two members of the Alaska
legislature (Rep. Harry Crawford and Sen. Hollis French, both
Democrats) have proposed a bill to enshrine the Permanent Fund Dividend
(PFD) in the state constitution. The Alaska Permanent Fund (APF) is
already in the state constitution, but the PFD is not. Conceivably, the
legislature could redirect the fund’s returns to support other
government spending. Crawford and French say that the proposal is
motivated by the worry that the legislature will reduce the dividend to
support tax breaks for oil companies. Any amendment to the Alaska state
constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the state House and Senate
and a statewide vote of the people. The proposal sent off a flurry of
op-ed articles on both sides of the issue.
The recent volatility of the fund and of state government revenues
fueled this and other proposals to change the APF’s rules. The APF
reached a total value of over 40 billion dollars just before the
financial crisis of 2008. It then dropped to 26 billion dollars about
the time the market hit bottom in 2009, generating fear that the APF
would not be able to pay dividends in 2009 or 2010. The fund has since
rebounded to about 34.5 billion dollars, largely quieting fears about
the current year’s dividend. However, fears of future volatility
remain, along with fears that a future legislature that might want to
sacrifice a stream of dividends to close a one-time budget gap.
A recent editorial in the Alaska Daily News argued that a better way to
protect the PFD would for the state to inflation-proof it by limiting
the amount of cash that could be used each year to five percent of the
total market value of the APF. Many endowment managers have used this
rule to ensure that their endowment produces a steady long-term flow of
income.
Support for the dividend is so strong that few critics of the amendment
say that they want to redirect the fund’s earnings to something other
than the dividend. Occasionally left-of-center voices portray the
dividend as tacit support for Big Oil (see a recent op-ed by Maureen
Suttman), and right-of-center voices portray it as some kind of
socialism. An editor of Britain’s conservative paper, the Telegraph,
accused Sarah Palin of being a “secret socialist” for her (very public)
support of the Alaska Permanent Fund. But few Alaskans of any political
stripe seem to see the APF this way. Overwhelmingly, both Democrats and
Republicans portray the dividend as an equitable way to make sure that
the state’s oil revenues actually do create long-term benefit for all
Alaskans. Opponents of the amendment simply argue that the dividend
does not need to be enshrined in the constitution to protect it from
legislators who might want to redirect funds elsewhere.
Yet, a movement to redirect the earning of the APF to other uses is
currently underway in the legislature. According to the Alaska
Dispatch, House Speaker Mike Chenault (Republican) has recently
introduced a bill to use some of the APF’s earnings for construction of
a natural gas pipeline. The idea is to put a nonbinding resolution
before the voters that would authorize the legislature to use any money
leftover in the fund (after paying the dividend and inflation proofing
the fund) for pipeline construction.
The APF has never been used this way before. Any money leftover after
inflation proofing has previously been reinvested into the fund,
increasing its value and leading to larger dividends in the future.
Therefore Chenault’s proposal will lead to smaller future dividends
than if the APF remained on its present course. Support for Chenault’s
proposal has so far been divided along party lines, with Republicans
for and Democrats against.
Recent articles on the APF:
Permanent fund looks back on profitable year
Pat Forgey, February 25, 2010, Juneau Empire
http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/022510/loc_567525884.shtml
Permanent Fund gas pipeline ballot measure won't provide clear answer
Dermot Cole, Daily News Miner
http://newsminer.com/pages/full_story/push?blog-entry-Permanent+Fund+gas+pipeline+ballot+measure+won-t+provide+clear+answer%20&id=6373728&instance=blogs_editors_desk
Should the Permanent Fund bankroll a gas line?
Rena Delbridge, Alaska Dispatch, Feb 8, 2010
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/3935-should-the-permanent-fund-bankroll-a-gas-line
PFD checks aren't worth the price we pay
Maureen Suttman, COMPASS: Other points of view, Alaska Daily News,
January 23, 2010
http://www.adn.com/opinion/compass/story/1107444.html
Is Sarah Palin a secret socialist?
Damian Thompson, The Telegraph, November 14th, 2009:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100016825/is-sarah-palin-a-secret-socialist/
Politics, economy fuel Permanent Fund debate
Rena Delbridge, Alaska Dispatch, February 11, 2010
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/politics/3706-politics-economy-fuel-permanent-fund-debate
Endowment model covers inflation, provides dividend
Alaska Daily News
http://www.adn.com/opinion/view/story/1086508.html
Permanent Fund may be part of Alaska constitution
The Associated Press; reported in the Alaska Daily News
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/ap_alaska/story/1081315.html
Lawmakers hope to write PFD into Alaska's Constitution
Ted Land, KTUU-TV
http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=11775512
Our View: Keep PFD where it is
Alaska Daily News editorial, January 7, 2010
http://www.adn.com/opinion/view/story/1084212.html
Comment: PFD needs to be put into constitution
John Havelock, former Alaska Attorney General, the Alaska Daily News
http://www.adn.com/opinion/comment/havelock/story/1095840.html
State Constitution not right place for dividend
Ben Brown, The Alaska Observer, January 11, 2010
http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/011110/opi_545486290.shtml
Empire editorial: PFD hyperbole
Juneau Empire, January 10, 2010
http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/011010/opi_544924604.shtml
Permanent Fund has poor year
Anchorage Daily News, January 30, 2010
http://www.adn.com/opinion/story/1116958.html
5.
U.S. FEDERAL AND
STATE LAWMAKERS CONSIDERING CAP-AND-DIVIDEND
The cap-and-dividend approach to greenhouse gas emissions is receiving
serious attention by lawmakers in the U.S. Congress and in the
California state legislature. Under cap-and-dividend, the government
auctions off rights to release limited amounts of greenhouse gases and
uses (some or all of) the revenue to finance a dividend. The strategy
can be a weak or strong approach to global warming depending on how
many permits the government chooses to auction off and on whether it
covers all or only some greenhouse gases. The dividend is, of course, a
small basic income guarantee, although it is usually justified not for
its own sake but as a way to ensure that carbon taxes are not a drag on
the economy or on the most vulnerable individuals. The inclusion of BIG
in cap-and-dividend has given it sudden political viability.
Senators Maria Cantwell (Democrat of Washington) and Susan Collins
(Republican of Maine) have recently introduced a cap-and-dividend bill
under the name of the CLEAR Act. According to the Sightline institute,
the bill has the following features:
- “A solid reduction target: 20 percent below 2005 levels by 2020
and 83 percent below by 2050.”
- “Full auctioning”
- “Individuals are directly rebated with three-quarters of the
auction proceeds.”
- “Details are in short supply when it comes to enacting a
border-adjustment tariff (to prevent industrial "leakage") and for
spending money on reductions outside the cap, as well as for
adaptation, international assistance, worker transition, energy
efficiency, and other programs.”
- “A price ceiling, … The bill does include provisions to offset
permits that are issued beyond those allowed by the cap, but the
details are sketchy.”
At the same time, California's Economic and Allocation Advisory
Committee has released a draft report recommending a cap-and-dividend
program for California. The report recommends that “the largest share
(roughly 75%) of allowance value should be returned to California
households either through tax rate cuts or via lump-sum transfers, with
a smaller share (roughly 25%) used to finance socially beneficial
investments and public expenditures.” (p.69). The EAAC estimates that
if 80% of auction revenues were returned to Californians, an
individual’s 2012 dividend would be US$103, rising to US$276 by 2020.
Related links:
The following website has a short story on the CLEAR Act and a long
list of links to related stories:
http://www.carbonshare.org/newsnatl.html
Sightline Daily has a mixed evaluation of the CLEAR Act:
“Cantwell's Cap-and-Trade Bill: Almost Genius,” Posted by Alan Durning
and Eric de Place, 12/11/2009:
http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score/archive/2009/12/11/almost-genius
Details for the California proposal are online at:
http://climatechange.ca.gov/eaac/
A Los Angeles Times report on the California proposal is online at:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/01/cap-and-trade-california.html
-From BIEN
Wall Street Journal article on the California proposal, “California
Ties Cash to Energy,” by Rebecca Smith and Keith Johnson, January 12,
2010:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126325739326825569.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
6.
IRAN MIGHT BE
MOVING TOWARD A BIG
Overshadowed by the recent turmoil in Iran, the government has been
making strong moves toward introducing something very much like a basic
income guarantee. According to Hamid Tabatabai, of the International
Labor organization, “In January 2010, the Majles (Iran’s parliament)
adopted a far-reaching law that progressively replaces subsidies on
energy and basic goods with direct cash transfers to the population.
The subsidies run into tens of billions of dollars annually, mostly on
fuel, and benefit the richer strata of society more than others. Half
of the proceeds will be passed on directly to the people through their
bank accounts, with the rest used to boost the development of
agriculture and industry and strengthen the country’s social security
system. Estimated at some 10 to 20 billion dollars in the first year,
the transfers would be unconditional, i.e. without any quid pro quo,
and universal, except for households who opt out by failing to provide
the needed information about their composition and socioeconomic
status. In setting the amount of the transfer to each household the law
requires consideration of household income but the most important
factor is likely to be the household size. Implementation will begin in
spring 2010 and take five years.”
Cash transfers are not new in Iran; a variety of programs have been in
place for years, but many Iranians, including many in government, see
that too much of the benefit of existing programs goes to already well
off people. According to Tabatabai, “the concept of a universal,
unconditional and regular cash grants emerges almost seamlessly as a
by-product of an attempt to address the shortcomings of the present
system. However, even if a BIG proves to be a logical and feasible
proposition from economic and social perspectives, its prospects would
depend on how the subject is broached and argued in the highly charged
political environment in the country.”
The situation is developing rapidly as the content and implementation
strategies of reforms are being worked out. Tabatabai will present a
paper on the Iranian situation at the Thirteenth BIEN Congress in Sao
Paulo this June.
7.
THE CLOSE OF
NAMIBIA BIG PILOT PROJECT
The Namibian Basic Income Grant Pilot Project has come to its
conclusion, the BIG (Basic Income Grant) Coalition announced recently.
After two years of successful implementation, the last payout took
place in December 2009. According to the coalition, the results of the
pilot project have proven the effectiveness of a BIG to fight poverty,
foster social development and kick-start local economic development.
The impact of the BIG was nothing short of spectacular: Poverty levels
and child malnutrition declined dramatically, while school attendance
and utilization of the local clinic improved. Likewise, economic
activities increased significantly while crime levels dropped.
Based on the findings in Omitara, the Coalition is convinced that a
national BIG will benefit Namibians in all regions of the country. It
is, the Coalition argues, both beneficial and affordable and its
implementation is thus a question of political will. The drawings of
the school children bear witness to the tangible changes in people's
lives.
The BIG Coalition has noted with disappointment that despite the
impressive results of the BIG pilot project in Otjivero-Omitara, the
Namibian Government has not yet committed itself to the introduction of
the country-wide BIG. According to the BIG Coalition, the delay in the
national implementation is hurting the poor in general and the
residents of Otjivero-Omitara in particular.
The BIG Coalition decided that it could not stand by and let the
residents slide back into the dehumanising levels of poverty that they
experienced before the BIG was introduced two years ago. Thus, while
demanding the implementation of the BIG nationwide, it will utilise a
'bridging allowance' to tie over the households for the time being.
This is not a solution but merely a 'stop-gap measure' which cannot
replace the BIG. The 'bridging-allowance' is limited to the
participants of the pilot and limitations thereof both of the value of
support to the individual as well as to the community are acknowledged.
The welfare of the country's citizens is the responsibility of the
Government. During the next one to two years the Coalition expects the
Government to introduce the BIG nationwide, which will make the
bridging allowance superfluous.
The pilot project has gained worldwide publicity and is part of the
global discussion on new approaches in development. In fact, Namibia
has been put on the world map because of the people of
Otjivero-Omitara. They have shown the world what can be done with very
little money, and that it is based on a human rights approach, a
philosophy of equality and a theology of dignity.
Recently, the BBC reported directly from the BIG Pilot Project in
Otjivero-Omitara. It was part of the BBC series "A dollar a day".
-FROM BIEN
For further information about the BIG Pilot Project see:
BBC Documentary:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2009/11/091110_dollar_a_day_pt2.shtml
The Namibian BIG Coalition website: http://www.bignam.org/
“Curtain comes down on Otjivero BIG”
Toivo Ndjebela, November 24, 2009, New Era, Windhoek
http://www.newera.com.na/article.php?articleid=8482
‘Fair government will rule for a long time’
Irene !Hoaes, November 20, 2009, New Era Windhoek
http://www.newera.com.na/article.php?articleid=8426
8. KOREAN BASIC
INCOME NETWORK LAUNCHES WITH LARGE INAUGURAL CONFERENCE
South Korea has a new basic income network. According to BIEN, the idea
of a basic income took off in Korea only a few years ago, when Koreans
with connections in Paris and Berlin discovered and reported back home
that the leftist Italian philosopher Toni Negri and the wealthy German
businessman Gotz Werner both defended an unconditional basic income.
Google soon entered into action, and by 2006 the ramifications of
BIEN's network were being explored, and BIS articles downloaded. In
2006, Kwack No-Wan, a left-wing philosopher at the University of Seoul
published an article in which he critically discussed the international
theoretical literature on basic income and formulated a proposal for
its implementation in South Korea. This spread the idea in Seoul's
left-wing community. The Socialist Party (a left-wing party founded in
1998) took it up, and so did, for example, the University teachers'
Trade Union. A network was formed in February 2009, and several books
and pamphlets have now been published, including, most recently, a
Korean translation of Redesigning Distribution (by Ackerman, Alstott
& Van Parijs).
According to BIEN, hundreds of people gathered on January 27-28 at the
heart of the world's third biggest metropolis for two intense days of
lectures and discussions entirely devoted to the proposal of an
unconditional basic income. Hosted by Sogang University, the meeting
was an impressively organized joint venture of several Seoul-based
universities, a number of left-wing associations, and Korea's small
Socialist Party.
The first day ("Basic Income for All!") was intended primarily for an
activist audience. It started with opening addresses by Kang Nam-Hoon
(Hanshin University), one of the first Korean scholars to become
actively interested in basic income, and Philippe Van Parijs (Louvain
& Harvard), chair of BIEN's international board, and gave the
audience an overview of the state of the basic income discussion in
Japan (by Toru Yamamori, Doshisha University in Kyoto and coordinator
of Japan's basic income network), Brazil (by Eduardo Suplicy, federal
senator and honorary co-chair of BIEN) and Germany (by Ronald Blaschke,
parliamentary assistant for the party Die Linke at the Bundestag, and
co-founder of Germany's basic income network), as well as several
contributions by Choi Gwang-Eun (representative of the Socialist Party
and author of a Master's thesis on basic income) and others about how
basic income could fit into the Korean context.
The second day ("Sustainable Utopia and Basic Income in a Global Era")
was intended primarily for an academic audience. Contributions covered,
among other themes, the relations between basic income and conditional
guaranteed income schemes (Blaschke), disability pensions (Choi),
migration (Van Parijs), single mothers (Yamamori) and investment in
human capital (Neantro Saavedra, University of Tsukuba, JP), the
"glocal agora" (Kwack No-Wan, University of Seoul), the impact a basic
income would have on the distribution of income (Baek Seung-Ho,
Catholic University, Seoul) and capital formation (Ahn Hyun-Hyo, Daegu
University) in Korea. The conference ended with a very lively panel
discussion which Senator Suplicy concluded, as only he can do, by
getting the audience to sing "Blowing in the Wind".
All the papers presented were available in advance in both Korean and
English in the form of two hefty volumes (600 pages in all). The
conference was also the occasion to present to the press a very
eloquent "Seoul Declaration on Basic Income" signed by over six hundred
academics and activists. And the foreign speakers (Suplicy, Van Parijs,
Blaschke, Yamamori) were dispatched the following day to address
seminars, student audiences and activist groups in various places
throughout the city (Gyeongsang National University, Seoul National
University, Socialist Party, New Progressive Party, Alternative Forum,
Academia Communix, etc.).
9. OTHER BIG
NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD
LYBIA: Mouammar Kadhafi pledges to abolish oil ministry and distribute
revenues directly to the people
According to Knight Ridder, the Libyan dictator, Colonel Mouammar
Kadhafi has pledged to abolish the oil ministry and distribute oil
revenues directly to the people. Kadhafi said, according to Reuters,
"All citizens have the right to benefit from the oil funds. They should
take the money and do whatever they want with it." He said that the
committees that run the oil ministry and other government agencies have
failed. "These committees will be replaced spontaneously by real
committees to be created everywhere by citizens. Citizens will get part
of the oil revenue directly. They don't need intermediaries." How these
citizen committees will be able to distribute money directly to the
people is unclear. Khadafi has made similar statements in the past, and
so we should not necessarily expect the creation of a Libyan oil
dividend to be imminent.
For more on this issue, see:
Ministries Abolished, Oil Revenues to be Distributed to Libyans
Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News Monday, March 03, 2008
http://libcom.org/forums/news/libya-abolish-most-ministries-oil-revenue-be-distributed-04032008
NEW ZEALAND: Proposal for a BIG funded by capital taxation
According to the New Zealand Herald, “Economist and fund manager Gareth
Morgan, who is a member of the Tax Working Group, has proposed a
radical tax restructure to the group's final public conference that
would impose a Comprehensive Capital Tax (CCT) on all land, buildings,
plant and equipment to raise NZ$19 billion. This money would then be
used to create a flat income tax rate of 25% on all corporate, personal
and trust income. It would also be used to provide each adult with a
NZ$10,000 guaranteed minimum income to replace all benefits”
The Herald article is online at:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10612839
A video of the proposal is online at:
http://www.3news.co.nz/Gareth-Morgans-radical-tax-overhaul/tabid/367/articleID/132177/cat/67/Default.aspx
A blog about the proposal is online at:
http://www.thestandard.org.nz/guranteed-minimum-income-capital-tax-the-way-forward/
ARGENTINA: possibly moving toward a basic income for children
Several political actors have recently expressed (cautious) support for
the idea of a basic income for children. The Argentinean government
issued Decree number 1602 entitled “Universal Assignment for children
as a social protection policy” (document available at
www.ingresociudadano.org).
On November 11, 2009, the Argentinian basic
income network Red Argentina de Ingreso Ciudadano published the
document “Assignment for children and Basic Income” with a critical
assessment of the governmental measure. The newly established
“Universal Assignment” takes a different approach compared with the
Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in many Latin American countries. It
pays an allowance to most parents with children under 18 years of age
who are unemployed or work in the informal sector. Even when there are
some conditions regarding parent income (which should not be over the
minimum wage), school registration, health checks, etc., that reduce
the universality of the benefit, the government projects to pay from 4
to 5 million benefits (covering about 70/80% of children with no
benefits from previously existing family allowances). The measure was
the governmental response to pressures from civil society and some
opposition parties who had long demanded a universal and unconditional
basic income for children. In this sense, it could be considered a
first step to other programmes moving in the direction of a true basic
income.
Within the framework of this ongoing discussion on universal child
benefits, one should also mention the two following bill proposals:
“Basic Income for Children and Teenagers”, bill proposal presented by
Silvia Ausburger, Member of Parliament (Partido Socialista); “Basic
Income for Citizenship”, bill proposal presented by Jose Antonio
Artusi, Member of Parliament (Unión Cívica Radical).
For further information: www.ingresociudadano.org
-From BIEN
ZIMBABWE: Alaska-style dividend proposed for Zimbabwe’s diamond mines
An editorial in a government-sponsored newspaper, reprinted by
AllAfrica.com, discusses how Zimbabwe create an Alaska-style dividend
out of revenue from Zimbabwe’s new diamond mines. The article discusses
the resource curse through the example of Nigeria’s oil. It suggests
that the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend is one of the reasons Alaska
has avoided the resource curse. The article is online at:
http://allafrica.com/stories/200912110512.html
BELGIUM: Socialist Party advocates a basic income for seniors
On February 8, 2010, the Flemish Socialist Party (SPA) published its
(still provisional) plan for a fundamental reform of Belgium's pension
system. It attracted a lot of media attention. Among the remarkable
features of the plan is the idea to implement a federal guaranteed
basic pension (so-called Gewaarborgd Pensioen in Dutch). It would
amount to paying a monthly basic income to all individuals when they
reach retirement age. According to the plan, this basic pension "needs
to be disconnected from previous individual labour productivity". It
would be funded through the income tax, rather than through social
contributions. The plan was designed under the leadership of former
Federal Minister for Pensions Bruno Tobback. The Flemish Socialist
Party is part of the coalition in power in the Flemish region, but not
at the Federal level.
SP.A website: http://www.s-p-a.be/
Pension plan (in Dutch):
http://www.s-p-a.be/common/showdocument.asp?iID=5117
Newspaper articles:
'SP.A heeft eigen pensioenplan', De Standaard, Feb. 9, 2010,
www.standaard.be
'Sp.a wil aanvullend pensioen voor alle werknemers', De Morgen, Feb. 9,
2010, www.demorgen.be
-From BIEN
LUXEMBOURG: First public event for basic income group in Luxembourg:
On September 29th, 2009, the Luxembourg basic income group had its
first public event. In the course of the exhibit "Colors of Money", the
group invited interested participants to a discussion about basic
income. The organizers themselves were surprised by the fact that there
was quite a crowd in the room. As a warm up, the film "Kulturimpuls
Grundeinkommen" from Daniel Häni and Enno Schmidt was shown. The lively
discussion that followed allowed many participants to share their
thoughts and opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of basic
income for the tiny and open economy of Luxembourg. Probably one of the
most interesting and challenging aspects of Luxembourg – from a basic
income perspective – is the composition of its active population, since
roughly a third of it lives in neighbor countries. The residency
criterion that is the standard rule to grant a basic income might cause
a huge uproar among cross-border commuters, and as such it should be
applied carefully. For example it could be paid out in the form of a
complimentary regional currency. An alternative would be a basic income
implemented simultaneously in the neighboring countries. On the other
hand, this cross-border issue brought one of Luxembourg's strong points
to the forefront: its highly international environment, and its ability
to bring people from many different cultures together. The group is
already in contact with initiatives from Belgium, France, Germany,
Italy and Switzerland. Prior to the discussion event and ever since the
group managed to stay in the news, through radio interviews, press
articles and a 15-minute TV magazine. On January 8th, 2010 a
constituent meeting is planned where the final name and short- and
medium-term goals will be discussed. Further information, including the
links to all activities, is available at www.grondakommes.lu.
-From BIEN
NEW ZEALAND: Democrats for Social Credit endorse a new Financial Plan
Democrats for Social Credit, a small political party in New Zealand,
has endorsed a new plan for financial reform, which includes a basic
income scheme called “Kiwi Income”. During their annual conference in
September 2009, DSC delegates approved a 7 point plan to reform the
“inherently unstable” financial system. According to DSC’s Press
Release, “this is achieved by replacing toxic debt-based commercial
bank credit with social credit. The issue of social credit will be the
sole means of money coming into existence and continuing to exist – and
will be issued in the public interest, to serve the common good”. A new
‘New Zealand Monetary Authority (NZMA)’ will be established as the only
institution with the power to create, issue, and cancel New Zealand’s
money. “Debt free money will be made available by NZMA to the New
Zealand Government to fund “Kiwi Income” (KI), in the form of a
national dividend to every resident New Zealander. NZMA will also be
able to fund Health, Education and Environmental projects - in ways
that decrease the call on family incomes.” For further information:
http://www.democrats.org.nz/OurNews/MediaReleases/tabid/111/selectedmoduleid/545/Artic
leID/337/reftab/36/Default.aspx
-From BIEN
UKRAINE: Towards the first affiliate network of BIEN in Eastern Europe?
On September 16th, 2009, the first international symposium about Basic
Income took place in Kyiv in Ukrainian and Russian. This event was made
possible by a donation from Germany within the international “Week of
Basic Income.” A wider debate is hoped for with the aim to found a
Ukrainian/Eastern European network to serve as a regional affiliate of
BIEN. There have been contacts made with universities and other
organizations, that are interested in Basic Income and that have asked
for lectures. The web-site http://bod.in.ua
(in English, German,
Ukrainian and Russian) contains texts of the speeches given at the
symposium, and further information about Basic Income – including
reports about the discussion in some countries, which already have
affiliates of BIEN. There are also videos on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/user/BODinUA.
These are the first sources within
the former Soviet Union providing information about Basic Income in
Slavic languages. Everybody is invited to support this network with
articles, opinions, statements or other resources. For further
information, please contact: <joerg.drescher@iovialis.org>.\
-From BIEN
BRAZIL: ReCivitas reports on its consortium Basic Income Of Citizenship
At Quatinga Velho, Mogi Das Cruzes, Sao Paulo (state), Brazil.
On the 25th of October 2008 the Instituto pela Revitalização da
Cidadania, in the small community of Quatinga Velho at the municipality
of Mogi das Cruzes, ReCivitas began an independent a pilot project in
the Basic Income of Citizenship (BIC) in line with the principles of
universality and unconditionality. The organizers hope that the
experience of this project will help educate the public about BIC, paid
monthly, in cash, to all local residents, at any time they wish to
participate in the project, without any discrimination or requirement
to reciprocate. The project is financed by a consortium of Natural
Persons formed exclusively for this purpose The project which was
originally expected to last for one year and pay a monthly amount of
R$30,00 to 27 members of this community. In November of 2009, at the
meeting to present the results of first year of experience, the
consortium decided to continue the project for another year. After 15
months, the project pays unconditional income to 67 residents of
Quatinga Velho. For more information, or instructions on how to donate,
contact: recivitas@recivitas.org.br.
BRAZIL: Workers Party puts BIG in its platform for the upcoming
elections
The Partido dos Trabalhadores (the Workers Party) held its Fourth
National Congress on February 19-21. All 1350 delegates, by unanimity,
approved a guideline as part of the Presidential Program of their
candidate Dilma Rousseff. This guideline includes the following
endorsement of BIG: “The expansion and the strengthening of the popular
consumption goods market, that produces strong positive impact on the
set of productive sector, will be attained by: … (h) permanent
improvement of the income transfers program, as Bolsa Familia, to
eradicate hunger and poverty, to facilitate population access to
employment, education, health and better income; (g) transition from
the Bolsa Família Program to the Citizen´s Basic Income – CBI,
unconditional, as a right of everyone to participate in the wealth of
the nation, as foreseen in Law 10.853/2004, an initiative by PT,
approved by all parties of the National Congress and sanctioned by
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on January 8th, 2004.”
10.
BASIC INCOME
STUDIES HAS BOOKS IN NEED OF REVIEWERS
Basic Income Studies (BIS) is the first academic journal dedicated to
research on basic income. It includes research articles, notes,
debates, and book reviews on all aspects of primary research related to
basic income. Right now BIS has several books in need of reviewers,
including:
- Van Donselaar, Gijs. 2009. The Right to Exploit: Parasitism,
Scarcity, Basic Income. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Prabhakar, Rajiv. 2008. The Assets Agenda: Principles and Policy.
London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
- Stricker, Frank. 2007. Why America Lost the War on Poverty...and How
to Win It, Chapel Hill, NC: the University of North Carolina Press. 360
pages.
- Blackburn, Robin. 2006. Age Shock: How Finance is Failing Us. London:
Verso.
- Prabhakar, Rajiv. 2003. Stakeholding and New Labour. Basinstoke:
Palgrave-Macmillan.
- Schroeder, Doris. 2000. Work Incentives and Welfare Provision: The
'pathological' theory of unemployment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
More books will be in soon. If you are interested in reviewing a book
for BIS, please contact one of the editors, Karl Widerquist
<karl@widerquist.com> and
Jurgen De Wispelaere
<jurgen.dewispelaere@gmail.com>.
11.
RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Widerquist, Karl. “The Physical Basis of Voluntary Trade,” Human Rights
Review, March 2010, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p83-103
Abstract: The article discusses the conditions under which can we say
that people enter the economic system voluntarily. “The Need for an
Exit Option” briefly explains the philosophical argument that voluntary
interaction requires an exit option—a reasonable alternative to
participation in the projects of others. “The Treatment of Effective
Forced Labor in Economic and Political Theory” considers the treatment
of effectively forced interaction in economic and political theory.
“Human Need” discusses theories of human need to determine the
capabilities a person requires to have an acceptable exit option.
“Capability in Cash, Kind, or Raw Resources” considers what form access
to that level of capability should take—in cash, kind, or raw
resources, concluding that a basic income guarantee is the most
effective method to ensure an exit option in a modern, industrial
economy.
Stricker, Frank, Why America Lost the War on Poverty...and How to Win
It, UNC Press 2007.
This book mainly focuses on creating jobs as a solution to poverty, but
it has 19 indexed-reference pages to a Guaranteed Income, including an
8-page analysis of what killed the Family Assistance Plan (Richard
Nixon’s watered-down negative income tax proposal). The final chapter
on "What Needs to Be Done," lists 17 recommendations. Number 13 is
"Start Planning for an American Minimum Income." The book is 360 pages,
with illustrations, tables, and appendix, covering the 1950s to the
present. It is published (Sept. 2007) by the University of North
Carolina Press in Chapel Hill, NC. $19.95. The Author, Frank Sticker,
is a professor of history at California State University, Dominguez
Hills. According to the Journal of Social History, "What is most
powerful about Stricker's overview is how he consistently presents the
political and economic decisions that have sustained poverty over a
half century.”
Podcast of the Sunday Edition show on BIG, October 18, 2009
According to BIEN Canada, on October 18, 2009, CBC Radio’s "The Sunday
Edition" aired a show about poverty, guaranteed income, and the Dauphin
Mincome experiment. The guests interviewed by Michael Enright were
Senator Hugh Segal, Ron Hikel (Executive Director of Mincome), and Dr.
Evelyn Forget (University of Manitoba).
A podcast of the show is available at:
http://www.cbc.ca/thesundayedition/listen_stream.html#
click on October 18, 2009
An interview on basic income in Gara (Basque Country, Spain)
In the framework of the IXth Symposium of the Spanish basic income
network Red Renta Basica, which was held in Bilbao on November 19-21,
2009, Yannick Vanderborght (BIEN & Louvain University) was
interviewed by Juanjo Basterra
from the newspaper Gara. Available at:
http://www.gara.net/paperezkoa/20091126/168834/es/Con/la/renta/basica/se/podrian/rechazar/los/empleos/indignos%C2%BB/
Basic Income for All! and Sustainable Utopia and Basic Income in a
Global Era: Proceedings of the Seoul Basic Income International
Conference 2010
Basic Income Korean Network
Seoul: Seoul National University, 302pp. and 337pp.
http://basicincome.kr/
These two volumes include the proceedings (in English and Korean) of a
Conference held in Seoul on 27-28 January 2010. Among the authors are
Ronald Blaschke, Eduardo Suplicy, Yamamori Toru, Philippe Van Parijs
(with Y. Vanderborght) and several Korean scholars.
-From BIEN
Steiner, Hillel. 2009. “Left Libertarianism and the Ownership of
Natural Resources.” Public Reason 1 (1): 1-8.
The author concludes (among other things), “if we hold that anyone
claiming ownership over some bits of nature must leave ‘enough and as
good for others’, we’re led by a series of plausible steps to the
conclusion that, in a fully appropriated world, each person is entitled
to an equal portion of the value of these bits of nature. That is, all
owners of natural resources must pool the value of what they own in a
fund - ultimately a global fund - to an equal portion of which everyone
everywhere has a moral right. In that sense, our just rights to natural
resources entitle each of us to what has come to be called an
‘unconditional basic income’ or, non-paternalistically, an
unconditional initial capital grant.” According to the author, the
right to this claim is not “a basic positive right,” which can be
interpreted to men that it is a right derived from the negative right
to be free from interference.
Rethinking Poverty. Report on the World Situation 2010
United Nations (2009), New York: United Nations, Department of Economic
and Social Affairs. Available online (PDF) at
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/docs/2010/fullreport.pdf
Chapter 8 of this official report includes a discussion of conditional
vs. unconditional cash transfers, and some positive features of
universal transfers are stressed: "... Given some of the problems
associated with conditionality and targeting, the question whether
direct cash grants to people living in poverty should be universal
and/or unconditional has been raised. ... In case of emergency, it is
possible to institute universal cash transfer schemes such as a basic
income grant with no conditions. Critics of such program argue that a
basic income grant reduces total employment in an economy by reducing
labor supply and the willingness to work by raising the acceptable wage
floor. However, in developing countries, the availability of basic
income grants may increase productivity and help smooth consumption.
For example, income grants reduce the need for workers to send
remittances to their families, thus increasing the wage available for
their own consumption, or for skills upgrading. This, in turn, could
increase productivity through better health and human resources
outcomes. Higher productivity will increase overall output and labour
demand. If a basic income grant is successful in boosting long-term
growth, the fiscal burden of the transfer would be reduced. The issue
of whether a basic income grant can serve as a key intervention for
poverty reduction has been debated in the case of South Africa"
(pp.141-142).
-From BIEN
The New Economics Foundation, “The Great Transition” The New Economics
Foundation, October 19, 2009
In their recent report The Great Transition, the New Economics
Foundation argues that a complete restructuring of society and the
economy is required. In particular the authors recommend 'the creation
of Citizens' Endowments of up to £25,000 for all people on reaching the
age of 21 to enable them to invest in their future, as well as
Community Endowments to provide commonly owned assets to invest in our
local neighborhoods. Both would be funded by a proposed increase in
inheritance tax on all estates to 67%.'
www.neweconomics.org/publications/great-transition
-From the Citizens Income Trust
Burczak, Theodore (2009), ‘Why Austrian Socialism’, The Review of
Austrian Economics, 22 (3), September 2009, pp.297-300.
This article is part of a symposium on Burczak’s book Socialism After
Hayek (published in 2006 by The University of Michigan Press). The
central thesis defended in this short paper is that socialist
objectives can be achieved in a market context with the rule of law if
market socialism were to take the form of competitive worker-owned and
self-managed enterprises, supplemented by universally available welfare
redistributions, which could include a basic income, universal capital
grants, or education and health insurance vouchers.
-From BIEN
Kirchgässner, Gebhard (2009), ‘Critical Analysis of Some Well-Intended
Proposals to Fight Unemployment’, Analyse & Kritik 31 (1), 2009,
pp.25-48.
In this paper it is asked whether it is meaningful to state a ‘right to
work’ as a basic human right to be written down in the constitution,
for example, whether working time should generally be reduced, and
whether those who do not have (or find) a job should get a guaranteed
minimal income. The author argues that all three demands have to be
rejected, at least in the radical form in which they are often stated.
They cannot be realized at all or at least not without impairing other
basic human rights. Finally, it is asked what can be retained from
these (usually well-intended) demands. Journal’s website :
http://www.analyse-und-kritik.net/
-From BIEN
Moss, Todd and Lauren Young (2009), 'Saving Ghana from Its Oil: The
Case for Direct
Cash Distribution', Washington DC, Center for Global Development
Working Paper, issue
186, October 2009, available at http://www.cgdev.org/
Offe, Claus (2009), ‘Basic Income and the Labor Contract’, Analyse
& Kritik 31 (1), 2009,
pp.25-48.
The paper starts by exploring the negative contingencies that are
associated with the core institution of capitalist societies, the labor
contract: unemployment, poverty, and denial of autonomy. It argues that
these are the three conditions that basic income schemes can help
prevent. Next, the three major normative arguments are discussed that
are raised by opponents of basic income proposals: the idle should not
be rewarded, the prosperous don’t need it, and there are so many things
waiting to be done in the world. After demonstrating that proponents of
basic income stand in no way empty-handed when facing these objections,
a third part considers basic income in functional terms: would its
introduction help to resolve problems of social and economic order that
are unlikely to be resolved in more conventional ways? This paper is an
expanded version of what appeared under the same title in Basic Income
Studies 3(1), April 2008. Journal’s website :
http://www.analyse-und-kritik.net/.
Standing, Guy (2009), Work after Globalization. Building Occupational
Citizenship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
In this new book, Guy Standing has refined ideas he has been making
since the inception of BIEN, seeing basic income as part of a
progressive strategy to replace social democracy. The book emphasises
that in a globalised society, tertiary work styles are becoming the
norm, in which forms of work other than labour are taking up an
increasing proportion of time. In that reality, conventional social
security is woefully inappropriate. Globalisation, tertiary labour and
labour flexibility policies have generated a new class, the global
precariat, which is not just in short-term jobs but is living an
existence without solid identity or a coherent sense of social
solidarity. Unless its insecurities, needs and aspirations are
addressed, the precariat will opt for political extremism. Yet, even
since the financial crisis, chronic inequality is not being addressed.
To combat this, and the growing amount of work-for-labour, a basic
income is essential to give security to the precariat. Standing argues
that a feature of modern consumerism, with its squeeze on time, is a
loss of leisure, as defined by public participation in society. He
concludes that the only form of ‘conditionality’ that could be morally
acceptable as a way of legitimising basic income is that people as
citizens agree to vote and to participate in political activity in some
way. In this, he differs from the view of Tony Atkinson, since the
community labour that Atkinson advocates would have distortionary
effects in the labour market. A basic income linked to participation in
civil and political society would be a way of combating the political
vacuum that is a true crisis in the making. The book, “Work after
Globalisation: Building occupational citizenship” can be purchased at a
discount price via GuyStanding@standingnet.com.
See the flyer at
http://www.basicincome.org/bien/pdf/Standing_Flyer.pdf.
Tomlinson, John (2009), 'The Northern Territory In(ter)vasion', On Line
Opinion. Australia’s e-journal of social and political debate, 14
October 2009, available at
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=9558
This article looks at the Australian Federal Government’s intervention
into Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory which involves
suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act, the quarantining of half
of Aboriginal people’s welfare payments for approved purposes and a
school attendance requirement, and comparing that with the Namibian
Basic Income Grant.
-From BIEN
Vanderborght, Yannick and Philippe Van Parijs (2009), 'Basic Income as
a way of tackling poverty', ENARgy, Newsletter of the European Network
Against Racism, November 2009, issue 30, pp.10-11. Available at
http://www.enar-eu.org/.
This issue of ENAR's Newsletter is entirely devoted to the 2010
European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion. In their
short contribution, Vanderborght & Van Parijs give an overview of
the reasons why basic income can be seen as an effective measure
against poverty. In the last paragraph, they briefly argue in favour of
a Euro-Dividend, which "might initially take the form of universal
child benefits financed at the EU level".
-From BIEN
Johan Ramakers, “Fighting a Jobless Recovery on a Micro Level, Part 4”
Searchamelia.com, December 13, 2009
http://www.searchamelia.com/2009/12/13/part-4-fighting-a-jobless-recovery-on-a-micro-level/
This article argues that the question for the near future is not how we
can create more jobs. “The real question becomes how to pass on the
financial accomplishment and productivity of automation, robotics, nano
technology and artificial intelligence to a population as a basic
income.” Ranmakers writes, “Three movements to reward people have been
analyzed as potential: a gift economy, a resource-based economy, and a
guaranteed basic income economy. All three systems are being
experimented with in the more progressive societies around the world.”
Young Margot & Mulvale, James P. (2009), ‘Possibilities and
Prospects: The Debate Over a Guaranteed Income’, Ottawa: Canadian
Centre for Policy Alternatives, CCPA paper, November 2009.
The idea of a guaranteed income has a long and respectable history in
Canadian political and economic thought. Recently, in the face of both
wide criticism of the Canadian income security system and growing
recognition of the unacceptability of current poverty rates, there has
been a resurgence in calls for implementation of a Canadian guaranteed
income. But the idea is a controversial one; progressive activists,
academics, and politicians disagree about the desirability and the
practicality of a guaranteed income. This report traces the history of
guaranteed income proposals in Canada, reviews the arguments in favor
and against, and suggests a number of other social welfare measures
that should be central elements of any reform program, but that
guaranteed income debates often ignore. Available online at
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/possibilities-and-
prospects
-From BIEN
The Citizen’s Income Trust, The Citizen’s Income Newsletter Issue 1,
2010
The latest issue of the CIT Newsletter contains, A progress report,
News, a conference announcement, a review article on Wilkinson and
Pickett’s The Spirit Level, and book reviews. It is online at
www.citizensincome.org.
Social Justice Ireland, “Policy Briefing,” February 2010
http://www.socialjustice.ie/content/policy-briefing-poverty-february-2010
The latest Policy Briefing from Social Justice Ireland addresses the
issue of Poverty and is published February 1, 2010. It argues that the
Irish Government and the EU should adopt a 'zero poverty' target to be
reached by 2020. One of the proposals contained in the Briefing is that
Government should move to a Basic Income system. Ireland had the
resources to introduce a BI system in the past decade but chose not to
do so. John Marangos. 2008. “Thomas Paine (1737-1809) and Thomas Spence
(1750-1814) on land ownership, land taxes and the provision of
citizens' dividend,” International Journal of Social Economics Volume
35, Issue: 5, pp. 313 – 325
This historical article discusses one of the first proposals for a
Stakeholder grant and one of the first proposals for full-fledge basic
income.
“Cantwell's Cap-and-Trade Bill: Almost Genius”
Alan Durning and Eric de Place, Sightline Daily: Northwest News That
Matters, 12/11/2009
Cantwell's climate bill aims high but misses. Try again?
http://daily.sightline.org/daily_score/archive/2009/12/11/almost-genius
This article gives a through evaluation of Senator Maria Cantwell’s
bill for a cap-and-dividend approach to global warming. It finds both
good and bad in the proposal, and it is optimistic that the proposal
can be improved.
Keith Rankin, “Tax Reform in Pictures” Scoop: Independent News
This online article include tables that show, for individual taxpayers,
average and marginal tax rates for: the status quo; conservative reform
options that recognize the comparatively high rates of tax that low
income that New Zealanders pay; and less conservative (but even more
principled) "refundable tax credit" options that integrate a flat tax
(inclusive of ACC) with a basic universal benefit.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1003/S00196.htm
12. UPCOMING
EVENTS
JOINT USBIG AND BIEN CANADA CONFERENCE, Montreal, April 15-16
See story above.
THIRTEETH BIEN CONGRESS, Sao Paulo Brazil, June 30-July 2
See story above.
GUY STANDING MAKES SEVERAL APPEARANCES IN NORTH AMERICA
Guy Standing will make a series of presentations of his book in
Universities in Canada and the United States this spring. His book,
Work after Globalisation: Building Occupational Citizenship (Edward
Elgar), argues that the growth of the “precariat,” the growth of more
forms of work that are not labor and the erosion of public
participation in deliberative democracy combine to provide a richer set
of arguments in favor of moving towards a basic income as a citizenship
right. The appearances include Rutgers University (March 15-16), UCLA
(April 1), Berkeley (April 5), North Carolina, Chapel Hill (April 9),
Massachusetts, Amherst (April 12), MIT (April 13), Carleton (April 19),
New School of Public Research (April 20) and Wesleyan (April 21). He is
also due to present at the joint USBIG-BIEN Canada Conference in
Montreal on April 15. All of these events are open to the public. Guy
Standing is honorary co-president of the Basic Income Earth Network and
a professor of economic security at the University of Bath. For more
information about any of these presentations contact: Guy Standing
<GuyStanding@standingnet.com>.
DEGROWTH CONFERENCE, Barcelona March 26-29
This conference will have a session entitled “Basic income and income
ceiling” asking the questions, “How can we politically implement a
basic income for all? How can we reform taxation and other policies to
impose a ceiling on high incomes?” Information about the conference
session is available at:
http://www.degrowth.eu/v1/index.php?id=90&L=0
13. RECENT
EVENTS
Annual meeting of BIEN Denmark
Copenhagen, Demark, February 27, 2010
According to the BIEN Newsletter, BIEN Denmark held its annual meeting
in Copenhagen, on February 27, 2010. Bruna Augusto Pereira and Marcus
Vinicius joined the meeting, and talk about the progress of Basic
Income in Brazil.
For more information contact: Per Sorensen perso1367@gmail.com
Report on the ReCivitas project
Symposium: “Activation or Basic Income? Towards a Sustainable Social
Framework”
Tokyo, Japan, February 26, 2010
According to BIEN, this international Symposium was organized under
supervision of Prof. Miyamoto Taro from Hokkaido University, within the
framework of the ongoing discussion about welfare reform in Japan.
Guest speakers included Jorgen Goul Andersen (Aarhus University,
Denmark), and Yannick Vanderborght (BIEN & Louvain University,
Belgium). Official organizers are the Welfare Regime Research Project
(JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research), the International
Committee, Society for the Study of Social Policy (Japan), with the
cooperation of the Economic Policy Institute for Quality Life, Advanced
Institute for Law and Politics, Hokkaido University, and Global COE
Program 'New Global Law and Policy for Multi-agential Governance'
For more information, please email: 226sympo@juris.hokudai.ac.jp
On February 27, Al Sheahen gave a one-hour talk on BIG to a group of 30
students in a "Wealth and Poverty" class at California State
University-Dominguez in Carson, CA. Al Sheahen is a member of the USBIG
Organizing Committee and author of Guaranteed income: the right to
economic security. The talk was organized by Professor Frank Stricker,
author of Why America Lost the War on Poverty...and How to Win It, UNC
Press 2007.
Lecture, "The Town Without Poverty"
The Hamilton Spectator Auditorium, Hamilton, Ontario, February 25, 2010
According to BIEN, within the framework of the "Science in the City"
lecture series, organized the Hamilton Spectator in partnership with
McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada), Evelyn L. Forget
(University of Manitoba) gave a talk on a basic income experiment in
Canada. In 1974 a small town in the Prairies (code-named River City)
became the subject of a fascinating social experiment: every family was
guaranteed a basic income. The experiment was paid for by the federal
government and the province of Manitoba, and its goal was to determine
whether people would stop working or reduce the number of hours they
worked as a consequence. The money flowed until 1979. The data
collected were never analyzed. Instead, it was warehoused and the
radical social experiment was largely forgotten. Was quality of life
affected by the experiment? Were people healthier? Were they happier?
Did the children stay in school longer? Evelyn Forget's research team
was able to access the administrative database for provincial health
insurance to identify everyone who lived in "River City" during the
experiment, and to compare their health and social outcomes with those
of other Manitobans matched on the basis of age, sex and family
composition who lived in similar Prairie towns.
For further information:
http://www.mcmaster.ca/research/sciencecity/forget.htm
February 3, 2010, University of Karlsruhe
On Wednesday, February 3rd, Bruna Augusto Pereira and Marcus Vinicius
Brancaglione dos Santos reported about experiences with the ReCivitas
pilot project in Quantiga Velho with Sao Paulo. The project distributes
direct cash benefits to those most in need. The report was contained as
part of a lecture by Prof. Werner. Afterwards the students and
presenters participated in a conversation on the realization
possibilities of the basic income. This talk was part of a series of
appearances the ReCivitas representantives will be making in Western
Europe. More information about ReCivitas is online at:
www.recivitas.org.br.
Inaugural Congress of South Korea's Basic Income Network
Seoul, South Korea, January 27-28, 2010
See story on the South Korean Network
Debate: Women, Crisis and Basic Income
Perugia, Italy, January 16, 2010
According to BIEN, this debate was organized by a national forum of
women. Cristina Morini, member of Bin Italia, and Luca Santini,
president of Bin Italia, took part in the discussion.
Further info: http://www.bin-italia.org/informa.php?ID_NEWS=156
Guaranteed Income and Social Rights
Carpenito Romano, Italy, December 5, 2009
BIEN reports, Carpenito Romano is a small city in the Province of Rome,
Lazio Region, Italy. The Mayor of the city took part in this meeting,
and discussed the regional (Lazio) law on minimum income. Other
speakers focused on the economic crisis and new forms of poverty.
Sandro Gobetti from the basic income network BIN Italia argued in favor
of a true basic income.
Further info: http://www.bin-italia.org/informa.php?ID_NEWS=152
Naples, Italy, November 27-28, 2009: Stakeholder's forum against poverty
The Italian basic income network Bin Italia took part in the
Stakeholder's Forum against poverty which was organized by several
associations, in cooperation with the Italian government and the
European Commission, in preparation of the 2010 European year against
poverty. Bin Italia, including its President Luca Santini, coordinated
the session about basic needs and guaranteed income on November 27th.
Honorary co-president of BIEN Guy Standing gave a talk during one of
the plenary sessions. See:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22357271/Programme-Fight-Against-Poverty-En
-From BIEN
Public Policies, Basic Income and Health
Buenos Aires, Argentina, November 25, 2009
BIEN reports this conference took place at the CEMUPRO (Centro de
Estudios Municipales y Provinciales), a well-known Argentinian think
thank. Speakers included Rubén Lo Vuolo (CIEPP, Red Argentina de
Ingreso Ciudadano) and Pablo Bonnazzola (CEMUPRO, Buenos Aires).
Further information: www.ingresociudadano.org
Bilbao, Spain, November 19-21, 2009: 9th Symposium of Red Renta Basica
The 9th Symposium of the Spanish basic income network Red Renta Basica
was held in Bilbao, the Basque Country. It started in the evening of
November 19th, with a video conference by Pablo Yanes (Universidad
Autónoma de la Ciudad de México). The following two days were mainly
devoted to a discussion of three issues: Basic Income, Employment and
Human Activity; Political Feasibility of Basic Income; Basic Income and
Social Movements. Featured speakers included Daniel Raventós, Iratxe
Arriola, Igor Mera, Yannick Vanderborght, José Luis Rey, José Antonio
Noguera, Iñaki Uribarri, Luis Sanzo, Gorka Moreno, Montse Cervera,
Florent Marcellesi, and Iñaki Carro. PDF versions of the papers are
available at http://ixsimposiorb.com/cd/.
The symposium got press
coverage in Gara. See the two following links:
http://www.gara.net/paperezkoa/20091121/167854/es/Buena/con/crecimiento/pero//buenisima/en/tiempos/de/crisis%C2%BB/
http://www.gara.net/paperezkoa/20091126/168834/es/Con/la/renta/basica/se/podrian/rechazar/los/empleos/indignos%C2%BB/
Rome, Italy, November 20, 2009: Guaranteed income as a European right
One day of debate organised by Bin Italia and other associations, in
the framework of the "guaranteed income in Europe" appeal that was
launched in May 2009, just before the European elections. The meeting
also launched the idea of a "guaranteed income as a right for
Europeans" within the framework of the 2010 European year against
poverty. Euro-MP Jean Lambert (European Greens) took part in the
meeting, as well as the representative for the Regione Lazio, who
promoted the regional law on a guaranteed minimum income. The meeting
program: http://www.bin-italia.org/informa.php?ID_NEWS=142
-From BIEN
Basic income conference
Rosario, Argentina, November 13, 2009:
According to BIEN, an Argentinean Basic Income conference was organized
by the Centro de Participación para la Elaboración Legislativa (CePEL),
at the Faculty of Economic Sciences and Statistics, National University
of Rosario (Argentina). It included a talk entitled 'What do we mean
when we talk about a basic income?' by Elsa Beatriz Gil (Red Argentina
de Ingreso Ciudadano). CePEL’s website is http://www.cepel.net/
Perugia, Italy, November 6, 2009: Women and basic income
Participants in this meeting included Andrea Fumagalli and Cristina
Morini from the Italian basic income network Bin Italia. As in the
Lazio region, the local political actors in Umbria are advocating a
regional law on a guaranteed minimum income. Topics such as the
transformation of work, the working poor, and the role of women were
also addressed. For further information:
http://www.bin-italia.org/informa.php?ID_NEWS=141.
Rome, Italy, November 3, 2009: The necessity of a guaranteed income
On November 3, 2009, Sandro Gobetti, Giuseppe Bronzini, Corrado Del Bò,
Alberto Guariso and Cristina Tajani from Bin Italia spoke at the
"ComPa", the national forum of public administration in Italy. The
theme of the debate was "the necessity of a guaranteed income". The
representative for the Regione Lazio (Italy), who promoted the regional
law on a guaranteed minimum income, was also among the participants.
For further information:
http://www.bin-italia.org/informa.php?ID_NEWS=140.
-From BIEN
14. NEW
DISCUSSION PAPERS
A Basic Income Guarantee as Reparations for Group Injustice
Richa, December, 2009
Abstract: This paper looks at the issue of reparations for group
injustice, mainly in the USA, and suggests a basic income guarantee as
a possible means of addressing that issue. The need for and legitimacy
of such reparations are first established. The author details some
personal experience with the issue, which includes encountering
frequent resistance to the idea. A basic income guarantee as a means of
getting past much of that resistance is then discussed. That is
followed by a brief discussion of benefits and limitations. The paper
concludes that implementation of a basic income guarantee is the single
best way to right the injustices suffered by people due to their
inclusion in certain cultural/ethnic groups.
Stone Age Anthropology vs. Modern Political Philosophy: Evidence of
Five False Factual Claims
Karl Widerquist, November 2009
Abstract: Political Theorists often make empirical claims with little
or no supporting evidence. A surprising number of such empirical claims
can be informed by anthropological and archeological studies of
prehistoric societies—studies widely ignored by the political theorists
making the claims. Often, philosophers are less than clear about
whether their statements about the Stone Age are empirical claims or
merely illustrative examples. This study shows that many important
political theories do in fact rely on unsubstantiated empirical claims
that can be informed by existing evidence about prehistoric societies.
This study assesses the following five claims: (1) Human
interaction naturally creates great economic and social inequality. (2)
A permanent commitment to obey a sovereign government is the only
alternative to an unacceptable state of nature. (3) Laissez faire
capitalism has greater “negative liberty” than any other system. (4)
Everyone today lives better than everyone did before natural resources
were appropriated as private property. (5) Individuals appropriate
property; collectives interfere with it.
This study demonstrates how these claims are essential to
commonly-used justification of property and the state. It carefully
reviews existing literature pertaining to these claims, revealing that
they are not verified (and perhaps are substantially refuted) by
empirical evidence: (1) Human equality has been maintained in some
societies without interference. (2) Many societies known to
anthropology have had no permanent commitment to any set of laws
without degenerating into war of all against all. (5) The “negative
liberty” of hunter-gatherers dominates that of propertyless people
under capitalism. (4) It might be possible to make the claim that the
average modern person is better off in a modern society than in a
hunter-gatherer society, but the least advantaged people in society
today are not better off and in many ways worse off than
hunter-gathers. (5) There is little evidence at all for an
individualist origin of property rights; early ownership was either
collective or dominated by individuals who also claimed the right to
govern.
15. NEW LINKS
BIEN Canada Website
Our sister network north of the border, BIEN Canada, has launched its
website. It contains news and information about BIG and about the joint
USBIG-BIEN Canada Conference in Montreal. The site was originally
designed by Jurgen De Wispelaere. The organizers of BIEN Canada will
refine and add information to the website over time. It is online at:
http://biencanada.wordpress.com
Impact of Social Benefits
Socialsecurityextension.org now has a matrix on the “Impact of Social
Benefits” around the world. The Matrix presents available evidence on
the effects of different social transfers programs around the world.
This evidence results from a desk review on the social transfers domain
and consists of quotes extracted directly from the literature reviewed.
The evidence contained in the matrix can be searched using different
criteria. You can search by type of impact (e.g. education impacts) in
which case you can further specify that type of impact (e.g. school
attendance or school enrollment). In addition to the type of impact you
can search the evidence by kind of benefit, type of program,
region/country and for specific categories (e.g. extreme poor). For
each evidence resulting from your search the name of the program and
the original bibliographical reference are identified and you can
further click to obtain more information on the program and the
original document quoted. According to its creator, Ian Orton of the
International Labour Organization, many of the programs that can be
scrutinized with this matrix share the same logic of Basic Income (BI).
Thus for all those interested in the BI it will be an important
research tool as one can quickly gain access to specific details as to
the impact of social transfers (e.g. the impact of family benefits on
child labor in Latin America or impact of social pensions on labor
market participation). Orton finds that social transfers schemes to
have a generally favorable impact on all a number of criteria.
The Matrix is online at:
http://www.socialsecurityextension.org/gimi/gess/ShowWiki.do?wid=59
For questions about it, contact Ian Orton: orton@ilo.org
Share the World’s Resources endorses a basic income
Share The World's Resources (STWR) is a nongovernmental organization
funded entirely through private donations which advocates for
governments to secure basic human needs by sharing essential resources
such as water, energy and staple food. In a position paper entitled,
“Economic Sharing & Alternatives: Crises and Opportunities in
Changing Times” Published February 10, 2010, STWR endorsed the basic
income guarantee, writing “The ethical benefit is immense, because it
is a planetary scandal that 10 million children die every year of
ridiculous causes; these children have nothing to do with our political
and corporate infamy.”
The STWR webside, including its discussion of BI is online at:
http://www.stwr.org/economic-sharing-alternatives/crises-and-opportunities-in-changing-times.html
A Basic income for Haiti?
On January 12, 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake occurred in Haiti. On
February 3, 2010, the death toll had swelled to 200,000. Several basic
income supporters are now advocating the idea of a basic income grant
to foster the reconstruction of the country from a bottom-up
perspective, echoing Guy Standing's plea for "Tsunami Recovery Grants"
in 2005. At the initiative of Alex Hornung (Luxembourg), a "BIG for
Haiti" Facebook Group was started, and a reflection launched about the
idea to pay a basic income of approximately EUR10 to every Haitian.
Alain Massot, a Professor at Laval University in Canada, argued along
the same lines in a column published on January 28, 2010. Jean-Paul
Brasseur, head of VIVANT-Europe, has suggested the implementation of a
basic income of EUR6, funded by the citizens of the European Union.
Facebook group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=291135833623&ref=nf
Jean-Paul Brasseur’s proposal:
http://www.vivanteurope.org/,
see Feb. 2010 issue of “Vivant
électronique”
Alain Massot's column:
http://www.cyberpresse.ca/opinions/201001/28/01-944053-un-revenu-de-citoyennete-pour-les-haitiens.php
Alex Hornung: kotpela@pt.lu
-From BIEN
Fighting a Jobless Recovery on a Micro Level
An article by Johan Ramakers (Ph.D. Econ) on SearchAmelia.com, in which
he argues that "The question for our near future is not how we can
create more jobs, especially noting that much of the recent job growth
in the USA has also been in lower wage service industry jobs with
limited to no benefits and little job security, so, even when job
availability would increase, they are not of the same economic quality
as in past decades. The real question becomes how to pass on the
financial accomplishment and productivity of automation, robotics, nano
technology and artificial intelligence to a population as a basic
income to build from."
http://www.searchamelia.com/2009/12/13/part-4-fighting-a-jobless-recovery-on-a-micro-level/
-From BIEN
YES WE CA$H! in Italy
This movement advocates the introduction of a minimum income in the
Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy. "The goal is simply a basic income for
anyone who needs it. We don't want it to be linked to wage labour, it
won't depend on the claimant looking for work or relate to their
ability to look for work; it will only depend on whether you earn less
than subsistence wages/income... One debate we have planned is to host
a talk by Luciano Gallino, an important sociologist who is an advocate
of a social wage, along with other researchers and academics involved
with BIN (Basic Income Network) that campaigns for a social wage
throughout Italy. We also have events planned in other cities in E-R
like Ferrara, Parma, Reggio Emilia, Rimini etc during the election
campaign."
For further information:
http://libcom.org/news/yes-we-cah-welfare-struggles-precarity-italy-03022010
Basic income on Facebook
This Facebook group devoted to basic income already has over 300 members
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&gid=10334829890#!/group.php?gid=10334829890&ref=search&sid=676348404.666098809..1
-From BIEN
YouTube Video Series on Basic income: “Lessons on Basic Income”
Joerg Drescher has created a YouTube video series with information and
interviews about Basic Income. It’s online at:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DBF5F5CD3B69C813
“Grundeinkommen.”A new film on Unconditional Basic Income Available in
more tha 10 Languages at:
http://www.bijankafi.de/entry_archives/media/film_on_unconditional_basic_in/
16. NEW MEMBERS
Ten new members have joined the USBIG Network in the last three months.
The USBIG Network now has 199 members from 34 U.S. states and 27
foreign countries. Membership in USBIG is free and open to anyone who
shares its goals. To become a member of USBIG go to www.usbig.net, and
click on “membership.”
The ten new members of the USBIG Network are: Dottie Stevens, Mattapan,
MA; Martin Bassani, Parker, CO; Frederik H. L. Reinbold, Aranjuez,
Spain; Cole Holiday, Denver, CO; James D. Quirk, Huntsville, AL; Denise
Villamia, Ridgewood, NY; Jean Boyd, Spokane, WA; Robert T. Hill, New
York, NY; Jeanette Blalock-Davis, Hancock, MN; Jeremy Miller, West
Sacramento, CA.
17. LINKS AND OTHER INFO
For links to dozens of BIG websites around the world, go to
http://www.usbig.net/links.html.
These links are to any website with
information about BIG, but USBIG does not necessarily endorse their
content or their agendas.
The USBIG Network Newsletter
Editor: Karl Widerquist
Copyeditor: Mike Murray and the USBIG Committee
Research: Paul Nollen; and Yannick Vanderborght of the BIEN NewsFlash
Special help on this issue was provided by Jeff Smith, Jurgen de
Wispeleare, Kieran Oberman, and Amanad Reilly
The U.S. Basic Income Guarantee (USBIG) Network publishes this
newsletter. The Network is a discussion group on basic income guarantee
(BIG) in the United States. BIG is a generic name for any proposal to
create a minimum income level, below which no citizen's income can
fall. Information on BIG and USBIG can be found on the web at:
http://www.usbig.net.
You may copy and circulate articles from this newsletter, but please
mention the source and include a link to http://www.usbig.net.
If you
know any BIG news; if you know anyone who would like to be added to
this list; or if you would like to be removed from this list; please
send me an email: Karl@Widerquist.com.
As always, your comments on this newsletter and the USBIG website are
gladly welcomed.
Thank you,
-Karl Widerquist, editor
Karl@Widerquist.com
===========================================================
KARL WIDERQUIST
Visiting Associate Professor in Philosophy
Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar
Mailing address:
3300 Whitehaven Street, N.W.
Suite 2100, Harris Building
Washington, D.C. 20007-2401
US cell phone: +1 504-261-0891
Qatar cell phone: +974 508-9323
Qatar fax: +974 457-8231
EMAIL: Karl@widerquist.com
PERSONAL WEBSITE: http://www.widerquist.com/
===========================================================